Complaint #201309964, September 2013

Incident: September 2, 2013
Received: October 23, 2013
Closed: May 20, 2014


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 73rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Adam Samet
Officer: Vanpelt, Frederick
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Vanpelt, Frederick
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Tavares, George
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Tavares, George
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Vanpelt, Frederick
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Tavares, George
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Vanpelt, Frederick
Complainant: Black Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Vanpelt, Frederick Black Male, 46 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Vanpelt, Frederick Black Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Tavares, George Black Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Tavares, George Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Vanpelt, Frederick Black Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Tavares, George Black Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Exonerated
Vanpelt, Frederick Black Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.