Complaint #201502116, March 2015

Incident: March 15, 2015
Received: March 23, 2015
Closed: October 8, 2015


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 69th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Martin Biliski, Kevin Oconnell
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Lalwani, Rajesh
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Lalwani, Rajesh
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Diaz, Francisco
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Lalwani, Rajesh Black Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Lalwani, Rajesh Black Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Diaz, Francisco Black Male, 29 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Lalwani, Rajesh
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.