Complaint #201600089, January 2016

Incident: January 2, 2016
Received: January 6, 2016
Closed: June 6, 2016


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 107th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Sjoberg, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Vivar, Diego
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Vivar, Diego
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Sjoberg, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Vivar, Diego
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sjoberg, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Vivar, Diego
Complainant: Black Male, 47
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Sjoberg, Daniel Black Male, 47 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Vivar, Diego Black Male, 47 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Vivar, Diego Black Male, 47 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Sjoberg, Daniel Black Male, 47 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Vivar, Diego Black Male, 47 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Sjoberg, Daniel Black Male, 47 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 45-49 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Vivar, Diego Black Male, 47 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.