Complaint #201601951, March 2016

Incident: March 3, 2016
Received: March 9, 2016
Closed: June 21, 2016

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 120th Precinct Staten Island
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Sean Dawson, Anthony Tanzillo, James Trapasso

Officer:	Marganski, Miroslaw
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Piscopo, James
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Marganski, Miroslaw
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Marganski, Miroslaw
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Marganski, Miroslaw
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Marganski, Miroslaw
Complainant:	Black Male, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Marganski, Miroslaw	Black Male, 37	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated
Piscopo, James	Black Male, 37	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated
Marganski, Miroslaw	Black Male, 37	Force: Other	Unsubstantiated
Marganski, Miroslaw	Black Male, 37	Force: Chokehold	Unsubstantiated
Marganski, Miroslaw	Black Male, 37	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Marganski, Miroslaw	Black Male, 37	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Action	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.