Miroslaw Marganski

Badge #10686, White Male
Former Police Officer at Brooklyn Court Section
Also served at 120th Precinct
Service started July 2006, ended November 2022, Tax #942123

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2010-772
Closed: 5/7/2010

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
8 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201602360, March 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: White Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201601951, March 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201602360, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Male, 44 Unfounded
Force: Handcuffs too tight White Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201601951, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
Force: Other Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 37 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-772
Closed: 5/7/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said officer was unfit for duty.
  2. Guilty: Interfered with an arrest.
  3. Guilty: Attempted to prevent an officer from effecting an arrest.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (30 days)


Other Documents

Staten Island DA Disclosure Letter 3/5/2020 references 'Dispute/Failure to Comply with On-Duty Law Enforcement Officer While Off-Duty', 'Unfit for Duty'
Bronx DA Notified Officer List