Complaint #201609182, November 2016

Incident: November 1, 2016
Received: November 2, 2016
Closed: February 17, 2017


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: C/V at PCT to file complaint of crime
Location: Police building
In NYPD Midtown North Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Jude Sciarillo
Officer: Smith, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 42
Allegation: Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: Formalized Training
Officer: Smith, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 42
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Smith, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Smith, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: Formalized Training
Officer: Smith, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Smith, Thomas Hispanic Male, 42 Force: Other Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: Formalized Training
Smith, Thomas Hispanic Male, 42 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Smith, Thomas Hispanic Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Smith, Thomas Hispanic Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: Formalized Training
Smith, Thomas Hispanic Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP

Penalty

Smith, Thomas
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.