Complaint #201704802, June 2017

Incident: June 10, 2017
Received: June 13, 2017
Closed: November 22, 2017

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued

Witness Officers: Adam Landau, Luis Marte

Officer:	Pierce, Joseph
Complainant:	Male, 26
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition:	No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer:	Pierce, Joseph
Complainant:	Male, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition:	Formalized Training
Officer:	Fernandez, Xavier
Complainant:	Male, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Pierce, Joseph
Complainant:	Male, 26
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pierce, Joseph	Male, 26	Discourtesy: Action	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
	NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Pierce, Joseph	Male, 26	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
	NYPD Disposition: Formalized Training
Fernandez, Xavier	Male, 26	Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording	Unfounded
Pierce, Joseph	Male, 26	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Pierce, Joseph

Penalty: Formalized Training

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.