Complaint #201705417, June 2017

Incident: June 29, 2017
Received: July 5, 2017
Closed: January 16, 2018


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Trevor Neal, Pierre Pradieu, Michael Scally
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Becker, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Force: Other Unsubstantiated
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Becker, Michael Black Male, 39 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Becker, Michael
Previously Adjudicated
Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.