Complaint #201705982, June 2017

Incident: June 30, 2017
Received: July 24, 2017
Closed: March 8, 2018

Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jamiel Altaheri, Julian Febres

Officer:	Hom, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Hom, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Perez, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Perez, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Hom, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Perez, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Hom, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Offensive Language: Race	Unsubstantiated
Hom, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Force: Radio as club	Unfounded
Perez, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Hom, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Offensive Language: Race	Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jonathan	Black Male, 32	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 30-34	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.