Complaint #201706642, August 2017
Officer:
Gibson, Lamont
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Gibson, Lamont
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Gibson, Lamont
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Dethomas, Pasquale
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Dethomas, Pasquale
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Dethomas, Pasquale
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Pena, Phillip
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Pena, Phillip
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Pena, Phillip
Complainant:
Black Male, 13
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Baez, Felix
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Rios, Nicholas
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Rios, Nicholas
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Rios, Nicholas
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Rios, Nicholas
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Rios, Nicholas
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Gibson, Lamont
Complainant:
Black Male, 16
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Gibson, Lamont
Black Male, 13
Force: Physical force
Unsubstantiated
Gibson, Lamont
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Gibson, Lamont
Black Male, 13
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Dethomas, Pasquale
Black Male, 13
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Dethomas, Pasquale
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Dethomas, Pasquale
Black Male, 13
Force: Physical force
Unsubstantiated
Pena, Phillip
Black Male, 13
Force: Vehicle
Unsubstantiated
Pena, Phillip
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Pena, Phillip
Black Male, 13
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Baez, Felix
Black Male, 16
Force: Vehicle
Unsubstantiated
Rios, Nicholas
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Unsubstantiated
Rios, Nicholas
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Unsubstantiated
Rios, Nicholas
Black Male, 16
Force: Other
Unsubstantiated
Rios, Nicholas
Black Male, 16
Force: Physical force
Substantiated (Charges)
Rios, Nicholas
Black Male, 16
Force: Physical force
Substantiated (Charges)
Gibson, Lamont
Black Male, 16
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Substantiated (Charges)
Penalties
Gibson, Lamont
CCRB Recommended Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status:
Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2020
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Guilty
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 10 days
Rios, Nicholas
CCRB Recommended Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status:
Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2020
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Guilty
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 10 days
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.