Complaint #201901262, January 2019

Incident: January 31, 2019
Received: February 11, 2019
Closed: June 8, 2020


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - subway
Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: Anil Sugrim
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ladas, Ioannis
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Eristavi, Giorgi
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Santos, Mayky
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Santos, Mayky
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Eristavi, Giorgi
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Espinal, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Electronic device information deletion
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Ladas, Ioannis
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Nguyen, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unfounded
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unsubstantiated
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unsubstantiated
Ladas, Ioannis Hispanic Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Exonerated
Eristavi, Giorgi Hispanic Male, 30 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Santos, Mayky Hispanic Male, 30 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Santos, Mayky Hispanic Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Eristavi, Giorgi Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Espinal, Jose Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Electronic device information deletion Unfounded
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 30-34 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified
Ladas, Ioannis Hispanic Male, 30 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Nguyen, Andrew Hispanic Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Exonerated

Penalty

Nguyen, Andrew
Command Discipline - B


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.