Complaint #202002984, April 2020

Incident: April 23, 2020
Received: April 30, 2020
Closed: April 19, 2022


Reason for contact: Other violation of VTL
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 105th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Joseph Angelone, John Chilelli, Gregory Elz, Jesse Kempen, Brian Nelson
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Derleth, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Derleth, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Derleth, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Boyle, Michael
Complainant: Age 35-39
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gonzalez, Sergio
Complainant: Age 35-39
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Boyle, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Derleth, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Klepadlo, Ariel
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Derleth, Nicholas Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Derleth, Nicholas Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Derleth, Nicholas Black Male, 50-54 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Boyle, Michael Age 35-39 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Gonzalez, Sergio Age 35-39 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Boyle, Michael Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Derleth, Nicholas Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Force: Hit against inanimate object Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Klepadlo, Ariel Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Penalties

Boyle, Michael
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Klepadlo, Ariel
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.