Complaint #202202287, April 2022

Incident: April 3, 2022
Received: April 11, 2022
Closed: July 20, 2023


Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 109th Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Faber, Terence
Complainant: Male, 75-79
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Faber, Terence
Complainant: Male, 75-79
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Schmidt, Christine
Complainant: Male, 75-79
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Faber, Terence
Complainant: Male, 75-79
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Faber, Terence Male, 75-79 Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Faber, Terence Male, 75-79 Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Unable to Determine
Schmidt, Christine Male, 75-79 Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Unable to Determine
Faber, Terence Male, 75-79 Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Unable to Determine

Penalty

Faber, Terence
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.