Terence L. Faber

Badge #17344, Black Male
Police Officer at 109th Precinct since September 2025
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail
Service started January 2005, made $151,000 last year, Tax #936559

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28839
Closed: 5/3/2024
Case: 2022-27554
Closed: 2/19/2024

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202205238, June 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202202287, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
Complainant: Male, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Male, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Male, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201905519, June 2019
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202205238, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 55-59 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202202287, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device Male, 75-79 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Male, 75-79 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Male, 75-79 Unable to Determine
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201905519, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Hispanic Male, 52 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 52 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28839
Closed: 5/3/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful search of a person's property.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2022-27554
Closed: 2/19/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to safeguard Department property (not equipment, i.e.: id card, shield, radio, parking plaque, activity log, cellphone, uniform apparel, vehicle, office, desk).
Penalty: Instructions
Recommendation: Instructions


Lawsuits

Geico General Insurance Company Aso Katta, Nageswara R. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023707/2014, Civil Court - Queens, September 15, 2014, ended October 15, 2014
Zero Disposition

Other Documents

Bronx DA Notified Officer List