Complaint #202202485, April 2022

Incident: April 11, 2022
Received: April 19, 2022
Closed: July 20, 2023

Updated: April 13, 2024


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 70th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued
Officer: Nikocevic, Jasmin
Complainant: Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Nikocevic, Jasmin
Complainant: Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Nikocevic, Jasmin
Complainant: Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Chu, Carlo
Complainant: Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Nikocevic, Jasmin Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)
Nikocevic, Jasmin Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Unfounded
Nikocevic, Jasmin Male, 35-39 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Chu, Carlo Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Unable to Determine

Penalty

Nikocevic, Jasmin
Forfeit vacation 10 days
Closed: Resolved by plea, February 2024
APU Command Discipline B
Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.