Complaint #202203051, May 2022

Incident: May 12, 2022
Received: May 13, 2022
Closed: September 14, 2023


Documents:
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter (Sean Claxton)

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 90th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer: Pimentel, Alejandro
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Pimentel, Alejandro
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Pimentel, Alejandro
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Claxton, Sean
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Pimentel, Alejandro Black Male, 35-39 Force: Vehicle Unable to Determine
Pimentel, Alejandro Black Male, 35-39 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Pimentel, Alejandro Black Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Stop Within NYPD Guidelines
Claxton, Sean Black Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons Substantiated (Command Discipline B)

Penalty

Claxton, Sean
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.