Alejandro D. Pimentel

Badge #30078, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 90th Precinct since January 2026
Also served at Queens Court Section, Field Training Unit
Service started January 2019, made $129,000 last year, Tax #967258

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Gender

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202405263, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311442, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202305772, June 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202207489, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: White Male, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202203051, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202405263, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202311442, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Gender Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202305772, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202207489, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises White Male, 75-79 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202203051, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.