Complaint #202205456, August 2022

Incident: August 7, 2022
Received: August 19, 2022
Closed: September 25, 2023

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 25th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Jimenez, Larry
Complainant:	Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Officer:	Leonard, Lutzen
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Byrus, Allyssa
Complainant:	Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Byrus, Allyssa
Complainant:	Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Jimenez, Larry
Complainant:	Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Peloso, John
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Peloso, John
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer:	Peloso, John
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Peloso, John
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Peloso, John
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Jimenez, Larry
Complainant:	Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Officer:	Peloso, John
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Rodriguez, Marcos
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Stanton, Dean
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Leonard, Lutzen
Complainant:	Female, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Jimenez, Larry	Female, 40-44	Force: Physical force	Unable to Determine
Leonard, Lutzen	Female, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Byrus, Allyssa	Female, 40-44	Force: Physical force	Within NYPD Guidelines
Byrus, Allyssa	Female, 40-44	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unfounded
Jimenez, Larry	Female, 40-44	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John		Discourtesy: Word	Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John	Female, 18-20	Discourtesy: Word	Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Peloso, John	Female, 18-20	Offensive Language: Gender	Substantiated (Charges)
Peloso, John		Discourtesy: Word	Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John	Female, 18-20	Discourtesy: Word	Within NYPD Guidelines
Jimenez, Larry	Female, 40-44	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint	Unable to Determine
Peloso, John	Female, 18-20	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Within NYPD Guidelines
Rodriguez, Marcos	Female, 18-20	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Within NYPD Guidelines
Stanton, Dean	Female, 18-20	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Within NYPD Guidelines
Leonard, Lutzen	Female, 18-20	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unfounded

Penalty

Peloso, John

APU Case Status: Pending

Penalty: APU - Decision Pending

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.