Complaint #202206015, August 2022

Incident: August 31, 2022
Received: September 8, 2022
Closed: October 3, 2023


Reason for contact: CV already in custody
Location: Other
In NYPD 5th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Feaggins, Leander
Complainant: Age 25-29
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Chokehold Substantiated (Charges)
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Restricted Breathing Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Hit against inanimate object Within NYPD Guidelines
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Handcuffs too tight Unable to Determine
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unable to Determine
Feaggins, Leander Age 25-29 Force: Hit against inanimate object Unable to Determine

Penalty

Feaggins, Leander
Pending
APU - Decision Pending


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.