Complaint #202207954, October 2022

Incident: October 29, 2022
Received: November 20, 2022
Closed: January 17, 2024


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 17th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Viverette, Lawrence
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Noa, Marilyn
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Johnson, David
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Pfeiffer, Jeffrey
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Viverette, Lawrence Black Female, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Noa, Marilyn Black Female, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Johnson, David Black Female, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Within NYPD Guidelines
Pfeiffer, Jeffrey Black Female, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Unable to Determine

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.