Complaint #202304353,
May 17, 2023

Officer: Gomes, Ankur
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Gomes, Ankur
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Gomes, Ankur
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Gomes, Ankur
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Gomes, Ankur
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gomes, Ankur Black Male, 30-34 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Gomes, Ankur Black Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unable to Determine
Gomes, Ankur Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Within NYPD Guidelines
Gomes, Ankur Black Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unable to Determine
Gomes, Ankur Black Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Formalized Training)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Penalty

Gomes, Ankur
Formalized Training

Details

Incident: May 17, 2023
Closed: October 10, 2024
Last Updated: December 21, 2024

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 84th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued