Ankur U. Gomes

Ankur U. Gomes

Ankur U. Gomes
Badge #9580, Asian Male
Police Officer at 79th Precinct since October 2021
Service started April 2021, made $87,500 last year, Tax #971452

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Complaints

4 Complaints
12 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Unable to Determine
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202404695, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202402748, March 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202304353, May 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202202670, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202404695, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202402748, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 25-29 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 25-29 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202304353, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202202670, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Greene, Benjamin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 504571/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, February 19, 2026