Complaint #202305106,
June 1, 2023

Officer: Lolja, Mirjan
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Lolja, Mirjan
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Lolja, Mirjan
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Lolja, Mirjan
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Headlam, Harriana
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Lolja, Mirjan
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Lolja, Mirjan Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Lolja, Mirjan Male, 30-34 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Lolja, Mirjan Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Unable to Determine
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Lolja, Mirjan Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Within NYPD Guidelines
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Headlam, Harriana Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Unable to Determine
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Lolja, Mirjan Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Within NYPD Guidelines
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: June 1, 2023
Received: June 7, 2023
Closed: October 10, 2024

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Police building
In NYPD 41st Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected
Video evidence collected