Complaint #202401077,
January 30, 2024

Officer: Rivera, Marco
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Debesse, Kathy
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Rivera, Marco
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Debesse, Kathy
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Rivera, Marco
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Officer: Debesse, Kathy
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Recategorized as: Abuse of Authority: Other
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Scalici, Luigi
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Rivera, Marco Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Within NYPD Guidelines
Debesse, Kathy Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Within NYPD Guidelines
Rivera, Marco Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Debesse, Kathy Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Rivera, Marco Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Debesse, Kathy Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Scalici, Luigi Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Unable to Determine
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Recategorized as Abuse of Authority: Other
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Scalici, Luigi Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Penalty

Scalici, Luigi
Pending
APU - Decision Pending

Details

Incident: January 30, 2024
Received: January 31, 2024
Closed: June 24, 2025

Reason for contact: Other violation of VTL
Location: Street/highway
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected
Video evidence collected