Luigi G. Scalici

Luigi G. Scalici

Luigi G. Scalici
Badge #12555, White Male
Police Officer at Criminal Intelligence Section since November 2025
Also served at 90th Precinct
Service started December 2020, made $96,700 last year, Tax #970844

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: False official statement
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (2)
Abuse of Authority: Question (3)
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Marcial, Nicholas vs City of Ny, et al., 2024 EDNY EDNY 24CV03158
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
19 Allegations
9 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
5 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202502031, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #202408512, August 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202401509, February 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: False official statement
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 14, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202401077, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202502031, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #202408512, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202401509, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: False official statement Hispanic Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 14, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202401077, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Marcial, Nicholas vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV03158, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 13, 2024, ended November 10, 2025
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 10, 2023, Plaintiff was the lawful front passenger in a vehicle stopped by Defendants Officer Galindo-Sanchez, Officer Cruz, Officer Crichlow, Officer Grullon, Officer Howe, Officer, Jalbrzykowski, Officer Ordonez, Officer Peterson, Officer Scalici, and Defendant Does #1 - 5. One of the defendants ordered all occupants to exit the vehicle. Defendant Crichlow and one other defendant searched Plaintiff at the scene of this stop and determined he was not in possession of any weapons, nor was he alleged to have committed a crime. Despite this, Plaintiff was taken to NYPD's 90th Precinct. Defendants Cruz, Crichlow, Scalici, Howe, and Grullon searched Plaintiff's person and property again on at least two ...