Complaint #202410325,
October 5, 2024

Officer: Sorto, Roger
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Espinosa, Joel
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Sorto, Roger
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Capizzuto, Michele
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Capizzuto, Michele
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Sorto, Roger
Complainant: Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Sorto, Roger Male, 21-24 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Espinosa, Joel Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Unfounded
Unknown Officer Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Officer(s) Unidentified
Sorto, Roger Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Capizzuto, Michele Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Capizzuto, Michele Male, 21-24 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Unknown Officer Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Unfounded
Sorto, Roger Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Officer(s) Unidentified': Unable to identify the officers who committed the alleged misconduct
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: October 5, 2024
Received: October 15, 2024
Closed: February 24, 2026

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected
Video evidence collected