Complaint #202509780,
March 9, 2025

Officer: Malik, Muhammad
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Malik, Muhammad
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Malik, Muhammad
Complainant: Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Gil, Erika
Complainant: Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Gil, Erika
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Arcangel, Eric
Complainant: Female, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Arcangel, Eric
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Malik, Muhammad Black Female, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Malik, Muhammad Black Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Within NYPD Guidelines
Malik, Muhammad Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Within NYPD Guidelines
Gil, Erika Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Gil, Erika Black Female, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Arcangel, Eric Female, 21-24 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Arcangel, Eric Black Female, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Within NYPD Guidelines
Unknown Officer Black Female, 21-24 Force: Physical force Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: March 9, 2025
Received: September 25, 2025
Closed: July 23, 2026

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - subway
Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected