Muhammad N. Malik

Muhammad N. Malik

Muhammad N. Malik
Badge #6463, Asian Male
Detective Grade 3 at 43rd Precinct Detective Squad since June 2023
Also served at 40th Precinct
Service started October 2016, made $198,000 last year, Tax #962567

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29040
Closed: 12/20/2023
Case: 2023-27877
Closed: 5/25/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$20,000   Miller, Tygee A. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 021429/2020E
$744,000   Prewitt, Dennis L. vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 027825/2019E
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unable to Determine
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202509780, March 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202204324, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202107408, November 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202101172, February 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202509780, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202204324, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202107408, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202101172, February 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29040
Closed: 12/20/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to damage property.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2023-27877
Closed: 5/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to seize a person's property.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $764,000 total settlements.

Cruzatty, Paolo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 803286/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 27, 2024
Complaint
Description: On January 27, 2023, while the plaintiff was operating a motorized scooter, NYPD officers including Kelvin Winters, Michael Milone, Edison Taveras, and Muhammad Malik, Tashida Wilson, Brian Flynn followed the plaintiff and struck him with their vehicle, causing severe fractures to the plaintiff's lower left leg. After the collision, the NYPD officers violently assaulted and battered the plaintiff. The defendants also refused to call an ambulance despite knowing that the plaintiff's leg was broken and that the plaintiff was suffering severe pain.

Miller, Tygee A. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021429/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 20, 2020, ended May 21, 2021
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 9, 2018, plaintiff was lawfully a pedestrian on 3rd Avenue, near 149th Street Subway Station, Bronx, when defendant police officers, without any reasonable or probable cause, assaulted and arrested plaintiff with tight handcuffs, causing injuries. Plaintiff was then transported to the 40th precinct and detained there. The plaintiff did not commit any offense and defendant officers did not have justification to believe that plaintiff had committed any offense. Charges were made against the plaintiff afterwards but were all dismissed in favor of plaintiff.

Prewitt, Dennis L. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 027825/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 12, 2019, ended November 19, 2024
$744,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: That on or about November 23, 2017 the defendants wrongfully assaulted and injured the Plaintiff while they were investigating a matter in the building he resides in. Defendant POlice Officers Christopher Pruner, Malik Muhammad deliberately and maliciously assaulted and injured Plaintiff by holding him in a choke hold, tasing and injuring him, an innocent male without any probable cause. These injuries caused plaintiff to be admitted to Lincoln hospital. Plaintiff still suffers and, upon information and belief will continue to suffer, great indignities, humiliation and ridicule; was greatly injured to his credit and circumstances; was prevented from performing and transacting his necessary affairs and business...