Joseph G. Seminara

Joseph G. Seminara

Joseph G. Seminara
Deputy Chief at Detective Borough Queens North since October 2023, active
Service started July 2004, made $218,000 last year, Tax #935723
White Male, 42

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number

Lawsuit settlements:
$10,000   Jurdine v. City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 07CV02915
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
7 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201000961, January 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201001607, January 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200511003, September 2005
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200503373, March 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201000961, January 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 15 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201001607, January 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 19 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 19 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 19 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 19 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200511003, September 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 33 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200503373, March 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 35 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 35 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $10,000 total settlements.

Rhooms v. City of New York et al
Case # 11CV05910, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Second Amended Complaint

Rhooms v. Enright et al
Case # 13CV05006, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Amended Complaint

Jurdine v. City of New York et al
Case # 07CV02915, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint, Stipulation
Description: Defendant officers unlawfully searched Plaintiff at 1353 New York Avenue and tightly handcuffed and arrested him and took him to the 67th precinct. Plaintiff had to appear in Family Court and petition was filed against him