Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2022-25368
Closed: 11/16/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully used physical force.
used improper force tactics.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (10 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Case Details:
-
Computer misuse
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Cameron, Jonathan, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 813487/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 4, 2021
Cameron, Jonathan, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 813437/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 4, 2021
Complaint
Description: On January 23, 2020, at approximately 6:30 a.m. inside of 1789 Davidson Avenue in Bronx County, Plaintiffs Jonathan Cameron, Guy Galloway and Jose Sosa were illegally stopped, searched, seized, arrested and detained by Defendant NYPD Police Officers, including Thomas Nunzio, Keith Bryan, Tawee Theanthong, Patrick Five, Michael Fassert, Steve Flores and Orlando Colon.
Plaintiffs bring claims of: activity retaliation, first amendment retaliation, unlawful search and seizure, false arrest and false imprisonment, assault and battery, excessive force, malicious prosecution, malicious abuse of process, denial of right to due process, denial of right to fair trial, violation of victims of violent crime protection ac...