Tameika Goode

Tameika Goode

Tameika Goode
Former Lieutenant at 32nd Precinct
Also served at 100th Precinct, 49th Precinct
Service started July 2004, ended March 2025, Tax #934950
Black Female

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14511
Closed: 1/21/2016

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$105,000   Francois, Oscar vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 027324/2018E
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
2 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202409435, September 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202200212, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201906845, August 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201702740, April 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 30, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201100024, December 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200808055, June 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202409435, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black, 25-29 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202200212, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201906845, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201702740, April 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 30, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201100024, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 41 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200808055, June 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 16 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 13 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 13 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14511
Closed: 1/21/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While conducting the second platoon roll call, made negative comments to another member of the Department.
  2. Guilty: While conducting the second platoon roll call, made offensive comments to subordinates
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Francois, Oscar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 027324/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 27, 2018, ended December 22, 2020
$105,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 3, 2017, while lawfully performing his duty as a UPS deliveryman around the northwest corner of Lydig Avenue and Cruger Avenue in Bronx, NY, the plaintiff was unlawfully approached, assaulted, battered, arrested, and detained by the defendants, including Tameika Goode and Kellard, in an excessive manner without legal justification. The defendants unlawfully approached the plaintiff, verbally and physically accosted him, including throwing him on the floor of the vehicle, punching, kicking, and striking him. They then falsely and wrongfully initiated the detention and arrest of the plaintiff. After being restrained in handcuffs, the plaintiff was slammed against the side of the patrol car and thrown int...

Other Documents