Ian Nadel

Former Lieutenant at 73rd Precinct
Also served at Transit Bureau District 30, 66th Precinct
Service started January 2005, ended November 2016, Tax #937160
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Discourtesy: Action

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unfounded

Complaint #201308723, September 2013
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201300449, January 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, October 14, 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
additional details

Complaint #201014806, October 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201308723, September 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 27 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201300449, January 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property White Male, 35 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 35 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force White Male, 35 Unfounded
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, October 14, 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
additional details
Complaint #201014806, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 42 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Biton, Iris vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV03981, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 3, 2017, ended November 30, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff arrived at her house to see her landlady grabbing at the plaintiff's daughter. A crowd of 20-30 people had gathered around plaintiff's daughter and the landlady. Police arrived at the scene and an officer stated that she was going to have to arrest both women. Officer Wright asked the plaintiff's daughter what had happened and then handcuffed and arrested the plaintiff's daughter. At the precinct, the plaintiff repeatedly asked officers and Sergeant Nadel why her daughter had been arrested, when she was the one who had been filmed and attacked by her landlady, but was told "I'll put you in solitary" by Sergeant Nadel. Plaintiff's daughter was then charged with dis con, assault in the 3rd deg, and enda...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/14/2015