Complaint #201300449, January 2013

Incident: January 9, 2013
Received: January 18, 2013
Closed: May 30, 2014


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 66th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Jeffrey Baldwin, Michael Catalano, Raymond Chang, Davianna Edwards, Francis Graddick, Lauren Herbert, Thomas Kennedy, Karendaliz Rodriguez, Osamah Salem, Nyaca Stewart, Peter Talavera, Andrew Washack, Latisha Wright, Robert Zaleski
Officer: Hernandez, Tanisha
Complainant: White Male, 31
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Nadel, Ian
Complainant: White Male, 35
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Officer: Nadel, Ian
Complainant: White Male, 35
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty
Officer: Nadel, Ian
Complainant: White Male, 35
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Ortiz, Jerry
Complainant: White Male, 31
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ortiz, Jerry
Complainant: White Male, 31
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Hernandez, Tanisha White Male, 31 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Nadel, Ian White Male, 35 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Nadel, Ian White Male, 35 Discourtesy: Action Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty
Nadel, Ian White Male, 35 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Ortiz, Jerry White Male, 31 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Ortiz, Jerry White Male, 31 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Nadel, Ian
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Forfeit vacation 1 days
Closed: Guilty after trial, October 2015
Forfeit vacation 1 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.