Raymond Kwong

Captain at Police Service Area 3 since September 2021, active
Also served at Police Service Area 6, Housing Bureau, 30th Precinct, 77th Precinct, 66th Precinct, 41st Precinct
Service started July 2003, made $175,000 last year, Tax #932870
Asian Male, 42

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment


Complaints

7 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208480, December 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201708677, October 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201303548, April 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201007095, May 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200918380, November 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200908490, May 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200615954, November 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202208480, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201708677, October 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Hispanic Female, 31 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201303548, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 21 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201007095, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 29 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200918380, November 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200908490, May 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200615954, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2011-3640
Document
Opened: 5/20/2011
Closed: 7/27/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to properly review information contained on complaint reports prior to approving the resulting in the reports being misclassified
Penalty: Forfeiture of five (5) suspension days, twenty-five (25) vacation days


Lawsuits

Pagan, Joshua, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 23CV05980, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 8, 2023