Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Kevin J. Falconer
Badge #5272,
White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Auto Crime since August 2024
Also served at
34th Precinct
Service
started July 2013,
made $190,000 last year,
Tax #954790
Lawsuit Settlements:
$13,000 Matos, Francisco vs City of New York, et al., 2018 NYCSC NYCSC 153623/2018
View Details
$13,000 Matos, Francisco vs City of New York, et al., 2018 NYCSC NYCSC 153623/2018
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
10
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
6
Exonerated
3
Unfounded
Complaint #202003367,
April 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202003029,
April 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201806113,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202003367, April 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons | Exonerated | |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Exonerated | |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202003029, April 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Hispanic Male, 25 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Hispanic Male, 25 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Hispanic Male, 25 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201806113, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Pepper spray | Hispanic Male, 24 | Exonerated |
| Force: Pepper spray | Exonerated | |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26271
Closed: 7/22/2022
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $13,000 total settlements.Ogboru, Ogalama vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 152213/2023, Supreme Court - New York, March 9, 2023
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff Jack Manno was wrongfully arrested and detained on or about April 30, 2023. On this date, he was a patron at a business located in Staten Island, when he was gang assaulted by seven attackers who were unprovoked. This assault was captured on video. With the manager of the business, he has informed the NYPD about the assault, but police officers ignored the information and arrested him anyway. He was detained for around six hours. All charges against him were dismissed.
Matos, Francisco vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 153623/2018, Supreme Court - New York, April 24, 2018, ended August 6, 2019
$13,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff Francisco Matos was driving his car in the middle of the night when Defendant Officer Falconer directed him to pull over his vehicle. Plaintiff Mr. Matos complied with the directive and exited his vehicle, at which point Defendant Officer Falconer searched Mr. Matos. Defendant Officer Falconer did not find any guns, drugs, or contraband on Mr. Matos' person, but arrested Mr. Matos anyway and placed him in handcuffs. Plaintiff Mr. Matos was taken to a precinct and held for several hours before being summarily released when the District Attorney declined to prosecute him.