Stefan A. Weaver

Stefan A. Weaver

Stefan A. Weaver
Badge #12423, Black Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Community Response Team since August 2023
Also served at 81st Precinct
Service started April 2018, made $198,000 last year, Tax #965901

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (2)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 8/22/2024
Case: 3 Allegations

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
9 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
8 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
2 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202406265, June 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202406059, June 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202404285, April 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202304213, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 16, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202301513, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, August 27, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202406265, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Age 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202406059, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 35-39 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202404285, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202304213, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 16, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202301513, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, August 27, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 8/22/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Palmer, O'neil vs The City of New York Et. al.
Case # 516582/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, June 29, 2026

Highsmith,day-Quen vs City of Ny
Case # 512514/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, May 31, 2024
Complaint
Description: On May 6, 2023, Plaintiff was unlawfully stopped, detained, battered and assaulted, seized and searched, and falsely arrested at the intersection at 1595 Broadway, Brooklyn, NY. Defendants approached and falsely accused Plaintiff of criminal acts before illegally seizing his person with their outstretched hands violently and aggressively grabbing Plaintiff’s head and body, punching Plaintiff in the head. Defendants searched Plaintiff’s person by aggressively shoving their hands into his clothes and intimate areas. Defendants grabbed Plaintiff about his body and extremities before violently contorting his arms and wrists behind his back to apply metal handcuffs in an excessively tight fashion. Plaintiff complain...

Other Documents