John O. Ogunmoyin

Badge #15089, Black Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 20 since November 2020
Service started January 2005, made $136,000 last year, Tax #937211

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (4)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22741
Closed: 11/23/2020
Case: 2010-598
Closed: 5/12/2010

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$35,000   Salgado, Noel Mauricio vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV06415
View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
12 Allegations
4 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Unable to Determine
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302703, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202302703, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22741
Closed: 11/23/2020
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failure to comply with an order.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (16 days)

Case: 2010-598
Closed: 5/12/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully duplicated his 2009 restricted NYPD parking permit and did provide said unauthorized duplicate New York City Police Department restricted parking permit to an individual known to the Department who then displayed said permit in her vehicle.
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Salgado, Noel Mauricio vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV06415, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 10, 2014, ended April 28, 2015
$35,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 29, 2013, Plaintiff Salgado was riding on the L train toward his home. At approximately 10:45 PM, Plaintiff got off the train at the Morgan Avenue station and was approached by two NYPD officers. He asked the officers why he was being stopped and began removing his jacket to show he had nothing illegal in his possession. Within a minute, two additional officers responded to the scene and took the Plaintiff to the ground. The Plaintiff was immediately handcuffed behind his back and he repeatedly informed the officers that the cuffs were very tight and that he was not resisting. The officers then carried the Plaintiff up two flights of stairs and transported him to the precinct. The Plaintiff was lef...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/14/2021