Tomasz Pulawski

Lieutenant at Transit Bureau District 4 since November 2021, active
Also served at 66th Precinct, 78th Precinct
Service started July 2010, made $213,000 last year, Tax #949511
White Male, 43

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Lawsuit settlements:
$65,000   Urrea, Natalie vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 508051/2020
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202107369, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202006718, July 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201905929, July 2019
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201607162, August 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Asian Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202107369, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202006718, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201905929, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 26 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201607162, August 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Asian Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Asian Male, 21 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Asian Male, 21 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Asian Male, 21 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Asian Male, 21 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Urrea, Natalie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 508051/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, June 4, 2020, ended January 19, 2022
$65,000 Settlement

Other Documents