Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Bell, Shantell, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 811139/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 24, 2023
Harris-Wright, Wayne vs City of New York
Case # 807520/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, May 17, 2022
Complaint
Description: On July 9, 2021, Wayne Harris-Wright (Plaintiff), while lawfully in the vicinity of Prospect Avenue and Dawson Street, County of Bronx, City and State of New York, was maliciously, intentionally and falsely accused by the defendants of having committed a crime. Defendants then took the Plaintiff to a police station in the County of Bronx and entered him on the records as under arrest, and was held him on various criminal charges at various police stations, correctional facilities and at the courthouse. A criminal complaint was issued by the defendants against the plaintiff without probable cause, reasonable cause or legal justification. The criminal action against Plaintiff was later terminated by dismissal.