Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Valdez, Bladimir vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV07610,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 29, 2025
Robinson, Ikeda vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810317/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 6, 2023
Complaint
Description: On March 19, 2020, the officers named Weiglein, Allen, and Pisano stopped, seized, and arrested the Plaintiff, without any cause. Plaintiff was violently pulled from his vehicle and was manhandled by the named officers. Cuffs were placed tightly on the Plaintiff's wrists, and the Plaintiff suffered numerous bruises. Plaintiff was then removed to the 52nd Precinct where he was processed by the officers as well as unidentified officers. At the Precinct the Plaintiff was further subject to several cavity searches. Named officers also fabricated and submitted false evidence resulting in the case being forwarded to the Bronx Prosecutor's Office. The case was subsequently dismissed