Arkadiusz R. Taraska

Arkadiusz R. Taraska

Arkadiusz R. Taraska
Badge #2205, White Male
Also served at Medical Division, Payroll and Benefits Division, 73rd Precinct
Service started January 2016, made $143,000 last year, Tax #961351

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number

Lawsuit Settlements:
$32,500   Jacks, Bilal vs City of New York, et al., 2020 EDNY EDNY 20CV01012
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
4 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202505747, June 2025
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202502429, March 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202312037, December 2023
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202505747, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #202502429, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202312037, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 55-59 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Female, 55-59 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 55-59 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Jacks, Bilal vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV01012, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 5, 2020, ended May 5, 2022
$32,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 28, 2018, Plaintiff was returning his home in Brooklyn New York. NYPD Officers Ellis, Deshommes, Stephens, Rivera, and Orrego forcibly grabbed Plaintiff and tightly handcuffed him, causing injuries to his shoulders, hands, and wrists. The officers refused to loosen the handcuffs. The officers then searched Plaintiff, but did not recover any contraband. The officers told prosecutors that Plaintiff committed an armed robbery with a deadly weapon, which Plaintiff alleges was false. All charges were ultimately dismissed by prosecutors for lack of evidence. On November 25, 2018, NYPD Officers Taraska, Paredes, and Liguori approached Plaintiff while he was socializing with friends on the sidewalk in Kin...