Jill M. Puma

Lieutenant at Uniformed Promotions Training Unit since February 2023
Service started January 2004, made $123,000 last year, active
White Female, 41

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop

Complaints

5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
2 Complaints
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

September 2005 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

September 2005 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
additional details

September 2005 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Unfounded
additional details
September 2005 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Male, 27 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.