William R. Kulik

Badge #23965, White Male
Former Police Officer at Staten Island Court Section
Also served at 120th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended July 2021, Tax #928600

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
3 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201908280, September 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201810099, November 2018
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201105664, May 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200716022, October 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200707365, May 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Female, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201908280, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201810099, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Hispanic Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Gender Hispanic Female, 16 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 17 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 16 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201105664, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 20 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200716022, October 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 44 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 44 Exonerated
Force: Pepper spray Black Male, 44 Exonerated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 44 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 44 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200707365, May 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Female, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Gender Female, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Pacheco, Sr., Michael, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV06785, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 25, 2018, ended November 21, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers approached, assaulted, and arrested Plaintiffs. One Plaintiff was given a DAT for disorderly conduct which was later dismissed. The other Plaintiff was taken to the 121st and then 120th Precinct, and charged with unspecified charges that the DA Declined to prosecute.

Szabo, Jessica On Behalf of J.p.s.r. vs Sgt. Sills, Linda, et al.
Case # 16CV03683, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 19, 2016