David K. Kim

Badge #26721, Asian Male
Police Officer at 103rd Precinct since September 2018, active
Service started October 2015, made $105,000 last year, Tax #959732

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28016
Closed: 3/6/2023
Case: 2022-27338
Closed: 1/25/2023

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302666, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202201234, October 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202104160, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Complaint #202302666, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202201234, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202104160, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 80-99 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 80-99 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 80-99 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28016
Closed: 3/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  4. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-27338
Closed: 1/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
  4. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, b - Command Discipline, b - Command Discipline, b - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days), vacation days (5 days), vacation days (5 days), vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Bah, Alhaji, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 513861/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, August 14, 2018

Other Documents