Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $15,000 total settlements.
Tingling, Deron vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 029361/2019E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 5, 2019
Salomon, Manuel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV04986,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 11, 2017, ended March 6, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was charged with traffic violation, specifically, designated driving while intoxicated and was ordered to submit to screening for alcohol or substance abuse and dependency. Plaintiff then defaulted and failed to appear at his scheduled hearing. Allegedly this non-appearance resulted in the cancellation and dismissal of the violation. However, on July 15, his driving privileges were revoked because of his alleged refusal to submit a chemical test.
Roberson, Ashley and Roberson, Linda vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301924/2013,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 29, 2013, ended September 10, 2013
$15,000 Settlement
Summons/Complaint
Galante v. City of New York et al
Case # 20404/2008,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Settlement