Shaun A. Walker

Badge #25797, Black Male
Police Officer at Police Service Area 6 since February 2026
Service started July 2022, made $64,800 last year, Tax #975242

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Question

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
5 Closed - Pending Litigation
4 Complainant Unavailable
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202409738, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202409000, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202403446, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202306726, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202305242, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202409738, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202409000, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202403446, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202306726, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Chokehold Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202305242, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Peters, Kimani vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 825854/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 18, 2025

Stephenson, Kamaal A/k/a Stevenson, Kamaal vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814215/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 22, 2025