Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Miguel J. Vivas
Lieutenant at 84th Precinct since June 2025
Also served at
Transit Bureau District 33,
Field Training Unit,
Strategic Response Group 3 Brooklyn,
69th Precinct
Service
started July 2013,
made $183,000 last year,
Tax #955642
Hispanic Male
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2022-26548
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case: 2022-26714
Closed: 10/10/2022
View Details
Lawsuit Settlements:
$7,500 Gregory, Jose R. vs City of New York, et al., 2017 KCSC KCSC 517139/2017
View Details
$7,500 Gregory, Jose R. vs City of New York, et al., 2017 KCSC KCSC 517139/2017
View Details
Complaints
5
Complaints
11
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
4
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202307695,
August 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 70-74 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 70-74 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202202999,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202105636,
September 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Other |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202102131,
March 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201706773,
August 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202307695, August 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Female, 70-74 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Unable to Determine | |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 70-74 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Unable to Determine | |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202202999, May 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202105636, September 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Other | Black Female, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102131, March 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201706773, August 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 25 | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26548
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Failed to supervise. Failed to conduct an investigation. failed to make proper notifications. made or caused to be made false or inaccurate entries in Department records..
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)
Case: 2022-26714
Closed: 10/10/2022
Case Details:
- Wrongful removal to a hospital.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $7,500 total settlements.Thomas, Kenniel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804624/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 20, 2023
Complaint
Description: On May 3, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully present inside the 69th Precinct. Plaintiff stated that he wished to file a police report for lost identification. Following Plaintiff’s request to file a police report, Defendants Police Officer Kion Gayle and/or Defendant Sergeant Miguel Vivas forced Plaintiff outside of the police precinct doors and onto the cement stairs leading to the sidewalk. Defendant Gayle and Defendant Vivas pushed Plaintiff from the stairs onto the sidewalk thereby causing a physical injury to Plaintiff, including to his back, and extreme pain. While Plaintiff was lying on the ground injured, Defendant NYPD John Doe Officer 1 turned on the engine of an NYPD SUV that Plaintiff was lying near, the...
Sibert, Lloyd vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802036/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 9, 2022
Sibert, Lloyd vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 531100/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, February 9, 2022
Complaint
Description: On September 1, 2020, Plaintiff was inside his apartment when he was aggressively approached by police officers Jordan Gambino, Yuri Enorme, Michael Sannella, Miguel Vivas, Frankie Tong, and Rosemary Gallardo, as well as 10 unnamed officers. The officers violently grabbed and contorted plaintiff's arms behind his back and applied metal handcuffs to his wrists in an excessively tight fashion. Plaintiff was unlawfully targeted for arrest because of his race, religion or ethnicity.
Gregory, Jose R. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 517139/2017, Supreme Court - Kings, September 11, 2017, ended July 2, 2019
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 20, 2016, at approximately 6:30 p.m., Jose R. Gregory was at the intersection of East 96th Street and Rutland Road in Brooklyn when he was falsely arrested by NYPD Officers Michael Raheb (Shield #28396) and Vivas. The officers, acting within their scope of employment, arrested and detained Mr. Gregory without probable cause or an arrest warrant. He was falsely accused of committing a crime and confined unlawfully, causing humiliation, emotional trauma, and physical injuries. Mr. Gregory alleges that the arrest was intentional, willful, and conducted without justification, violating his constitutional and civil rights.