Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2022-25964
Closed: 7/19/2022
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-25696
Closed: 6/24/2022
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2010-2425
Closed: 1/13/2012
Case Details:
-
Pleaded Guilty:
While on-duty, failed to follow darp procedures by allowing a non-darp towing company to remove motor vehicles from the scene of various accidents.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
While on-duty, failed to follow darp procedures by not issuing a notice of violation to the unauthorized towing company, when it appeared at the scene of various motor vehicle accidents and towed said vehicles from the scene.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
While on-duty, failed to follow darp procedure by not requesting an authorized darp towing company and allowing a non-darp towing company to remove vehicles from the scene of various motor vehicle accidents.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (60 days)
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Doe, Anna vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV00670,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 9, 2018
Complaint
Description: The Plaintiff was on the street when Defendant Officers Hall and Martins without any cause unlawfully searched and forced the Plaintiff to expose her chest, assaulted, battered, handcuffed, interrogated and falsely arrested. Defendant Officers Hall and Martins drove to Bay Ridge and other parts of Brooklyn where they continued the sexual assault and rape of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff was taken to the 60th Precinct without any charges. Later that night, the Plaintiff sought medical attention at Maimonides Hospital ER were she was intimidated and bullied by Defendant Officer Markov and other John Does.
Lin, Mei Ling vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV09994,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 8, 2014, ended September 26, 2017
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Complaint
Description: On March 6, 2014, Plaintiff was six months pregnant and working at a Chinese restaurant, a registered business owned by her husband that does not sell alcohol. Plaintiff is not fluent in English. Several uniformed POs entered the restaurant and exited with an arrested customer. The PO's reentered and asked Plaintiff for ID, one saying if she doesn't have ID she will be sent to jail. They raised their voices and spoke in intimidating tones.
Plaintiff was afraid and attempted to call her husband, a PO grabbed her phone and threw it onto the counter. A PO forcefully grabbed Plaintiff's arms and twisted them to handcuff her behind her back. Plaintiff cried, saying she was in pain from the PO's handling because sh...