Patrick W. Wright

Patrick W. Wright

Patrick W. Wright
Badge #10855, White Male
Police Officer at 113rd Precinct Domestic Violence Squad since July 2026
Also served at 113th Precinct
Service started January 2016, made $165,000 last year, Tax #961462

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202503922, April 2025
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201901027, February 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 22
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201803458, April 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202503922, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201901027, February 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 22 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201803458, April 2018
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Dixon, Terrance vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 720846/2025, Supreme Court - Queens, August 28, 2025

Isaacs, Andrew vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 722548/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, February 14, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about July 24, 2020, Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and prosecuted on the street by Officer David Fitchik, Officer Patrick Wright, and Officer John Robert. Plaintiff was then arrested and prosecuted. The defendants fabricated evidence. The defendants gave false testimony to the grand jury and hid exculpatory evidence. Even though the defendant police officers and District Attorney knew, or should have known, that no crime had been committed, they still proceeded to arrest plaintiff, charge and then drop same charges, assault and incarcerate plaintiff just to intimidate plaintiff, further aggravating the plaintiff’s injuries.