Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Dixon, Terrance vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 720846/2025,
Supreme Court - Queens, August 28, 2025
Isaacs, Andrew vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 722548/2021,
Supreme Court - Queens, February 14, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about July 24, 2020, Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and prosecuted on the street by Officer David Fitchik, Officer Patrick Wright, and Officer John Robert. Plaintiff was then arrested and prosecuted. The defendants fabricated evidence. The defendants gave false testimony to the grand jury and hid exculpatory evidence. Even though the defendant police officers and District Attorney knew, or should have known, that no crime had been committed, they still proceeded to arrest plaintiff, charge and then drop same charges, assault and incarcerate plaintiff just to intimidate plaintiff, further aggravating the plaintiff’s injuries.