Robert R. Uribe

Badge #20097, Hispanic Male, 43
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since January 2013, active
Also served at 120th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $136,000 last year, Tax #937662

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object (2)
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Action
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24283
Closed: 8/29/2022
Case: 2022-26631
Closed: 8/1/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$27,500   Green, Marita vs City of New York, et al., 2018 NYCSC NYCSC 160486/2018
$155,000   Champagne et al v. City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 11CV05644
View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
19 Allegations
8 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
3 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complainant Unavailable
3 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300172, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202105968, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202202839, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202100898, February 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201906612, July 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #201905111, June 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #200801792, February 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200615891, November 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202300172, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202105968, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Black Female, 40-44 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202202839, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 40-44 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Male, 40-44 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202100898, February 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201906612, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 35 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 35 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201905111, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 33 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 33 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Female, 33 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Action Female, 33 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #200801792, February 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 26 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200615891, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24283
Closed: 8/29/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to activate their body-worn camera.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully used physical force.
  4. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to notify Supervisor.
  5. Pleaded Guilty: Failure to render medical aid
  6. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully used excessive force.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)

Case: 2022-26631
Closed: 8/1/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to obtain medical treatment.
  2. Wrongfully used physical force.
  3. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $182,500 total settlements.

Jackson, Gladys, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150247/2022, Supreme Court - New York, January 12, 2022

Wright, Tanysha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 152872/2021, Supreme Court - New York, April 19, 2021

Green, Marita vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 160486/2018, Supreme Court - New York, November 20, 2018, ended March 21, 2023
$27,500 Settlement

White, Marlow vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06696, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 31, 2015, ended September 12, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff is a man of trans experience and was the victim of numerous hate crimes, chosen as a victim because of his gender identity. When the New York City Police Department was called to the scene of the first attack on Plaintiff's family by the assailant the responding officers witnessed Assailant's criminal behavior. The NYPD's officers refused to restrain or arrest Assailant and refused to take Plaintiff's criminal complaint against Assailant. To the contrary, the NYPD's officers joked with Assailant and indicated to witnesses, within earshot of Plaintiff and Assailant, that they preferred to return to clean up the mess after Assailant had murdered Plaintiff.

Champagne et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 11CV05644, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$155,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint, Stipulation